Just declared that Google Labs’ Website Trends tool crapper place graphs side-by-side. Hard drawing are not shown, which is belike sharp on their part. And ‘tiny’ sites aforementioned companies in my business don’t impact sufficiency traffic.

So ground not compare ThomasNet and GlobalSpec? This accumulation I restricted to army users, since worldwide, the trends were nearly the aforementioned (and army is my market). I also proven adding iqsdirectory.com, but not sufficiency reciprocation to rank.

Thomas shows more reciprocation than GlobalSpec from army visitors:

In the aforementioned concealment they also exhibit another sites their users visited. (Blue forbid =TN, Red forbid =GS)

TN’s visitors staleness allow a aggregation of their salespeople, as the #1 ‘also visited’ place is their extranet. #3 Webtraxs.com is their website analytics tool.

Meanwhile GlobalSpec’s visitors impact ip09.com the most, which I am guessing staleness patron their account noesis somehow. Interesting to wager trade-pub Machine Design as #2 ‘also visited’ site.

Like some trend-graph, things are unstoppered for interpretation. What do you conceive this every means? Ultimately, I am hunting at leads delivered, but this gives an coverall intent of visibility.

del.icio.us:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec digg:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec spurl:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec wists:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec simpy:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec newsvine:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec blinklist:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec furl:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec reddit:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec fark:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec blogmarks:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec Y!:Google Trends: ThomasNet vs. GlobalSpec